What kind of art do I like and why?

well, the art that I mostly like is the art of making people change for good.. but going to the art as we know today (music, literature, scuplture, etc.), I mostly like music. the reason why I like music over other arts, is because I like an art where talent can be shown. even if that breaks the rules of the essence of art, i like talent over the truths of the artist.. i dont know why.. maybe i don't have the talent to identify good artists over talented people, but that's just me. i did a whole classwork about the talent and the truths of the artist.. i feel like i will repeat the classwork here, so Jose is the one who knows my work.. i dont know if i should feel shameful for being lazy and not doing the work all over again or just keep living and get what i deserve.. i hope we get to talk about things related to the classwork, but not too alike like this one..

Ding an Sich -> Meaning

Meanings are mental representations accepted by a society to be considered that way. What makes a meaning a meaning? We stablish meanings, we say if this is that or that is this, and if many people say that´s ok, it will be on a dictionary saying that many people consider it that way, and after a generation the new dictionaries will say that that representations is the meaning of something, so there is a new word.
the ¨meaningish¨ of a meaning as just said is its concept; this is the base of the Ding an Sich of everything. I did a classwork saying what i just have said before in 2 pages, and i don´t have my notebook here and i don´t want to think about it again because after school my mind takes a break and i don´t want to interrupt my mind on its break, so deal with it
here are the nice pics

Sanity = Power -> ?

Well, sanity doesn´t exist. I believe there is a missing part on the question or Jose is insane, but there is something wrong.
how can sanity represent power? is insanity not powerful? i can´t think of answers to this questions, it doesn´t make sense. sanity doesn´t exist, sanity is not defined, insanity is overrated, insanity is definded by societies, THIS DOESN´T MAKE SENSE!!
now some pics for personal enjoying

Neurosis...

well, one neurosis of mine, is when people are lazy and depend on other people. it can be for studying or it can be for asking him to pass on the remote. i can't tolerate those people. maybe the reason of that is because my dad wants me to be autosufficient and independant, and i want that too. but there are other neurosis caused by my father which didn't help much in my childhood but its all good now... i can't remember my childhood because of that

Socialism.. or Capitalism?

well, in class we learned a lot about socialism, but not about capitalism. but now i know
Socialism is the economic system that has scales. in one scale you can find the rich people, and in the other side poor people. the poor people make one side of the scale to stay in the floor while the other side can't do anything about it. Why are the richs on the low side? because in their pockets their money is heavier than them, making the poor people with no money go through the roof. so what now? Socialism make the scales (or tries to) be equal. so how does that happen? everything, but absolutely everything regarding to economy is supervised by the government. how many money you make, your goods, your actions, everything; in order so the extra money you have goes to the government so they will give it to the ones who need. you know, that is a perfect economy, a governments dream, a Disney world. but that ain't happening nor gonna happen. we are not kings and queens with perfect values, we are people; persons who are different to each other in all aspects. as once Hobbes said, man is not good by nature, because we always look for more, more is good; and for poor people, they are too lazy to work, to think, to be brave, to seek for money not for pleasure but for their family or their goals in life. because of that, Socialism is an utopia, as said before the magic of Disney (maybe disney should put princess on Cuba and say that the government is good; wait, that wouldn't work...)

NOW (aaaaawwwwww!!! i was getting tired of Socialism), Capitalism
Capitalism is like saying, you done your work, this is what you get for it. you get what you give, everything is fair and justified, and the government can worry about other stuff. this is the type of economy that works here in our country and a lot of others (not gonna say examples, just think of a country that doesn't have socialism and there you have your answer. stop being poor). it doesn't matter if you are rich or poor, you are what you give, you get money for what you do. there are no scales, no government visiting you to know how you scratch your balls at work and take your money, disney can go to hell, we live our lives, we don't care of the poor lady with cancer, we mind our own businesses.
now, to take a stand, i go for capitalism. as said before, socialism are your unconscious thoughts when Disney comes around, is the dream we don't dream because we are capitalists, we worry about ourselves, we live our lives, we reproduce, we die. if we were socialists, the rich people would get tired that the poor people use their money and believe that if they stop working they would still get money from the government. but what if there are no rich people, only poor? no one pays taxes because they don't have money, so where does the government get money to keep their citizens alive? socialism would work if everybody would work hard and be rich so no one needs money from the government, but that can be done in capitalism also. Socialism is Marx dream, in which many male reproductive organ heads tried to make it real, and still want to do it. DISNEY IS NOT REAL LIFE! I WISH I COULD SMACK AND SAY: WAKE UP YOU SOPERUTANO ARRAPASTROZO!!!!!!!!! THIS IS SPARTA!!!! NO DISNEY HERE!!! YOU HAVE NO FREAKING IDEA OF WHAT YOU ARE DOING!!!!
(Sighs)

Are humans matter.. or psyche?

well, we must first define matter and psyche
matter is everything that occupies space and has mass and weight
the psyche is the influence of thought, personality and behaviour of humans
now, if we had to decide one or another (not both, nor neither), i would decide humans are matter, because we are mostly mass and weight and occupy space. If we were only psyche, were would that be? Because we are matter, we do have a brain. We can think, do and be. If we were only psyche, were would we be? that will bring us in an existentialism crysis, because if there was no matter, this would all be a dream, or matter is not physical just like psyche, so physical things don't exist. We don't exist. Were are we?
So, we are definetely matter. Psyche doesn't change us at all. We are who we are because of our DNA and because of our experiences in life. If psyche is the influence to think, do and be, then what is our brain? Our brain does have conscience and unconsciousness and we have our personality because of our DNA and we are who we are because of that and because of our experiences that later become knowledges and wisdom. Psyche doesn't exist, psyche is a religion, psyche is impossible to feel, bear, sense. Even passion, the ignition that make us do what we do with or without reason, is called adrenaline, in small or big quantities, and its all a chemical process in our brain. PSYCHE DOES NOT EXIST!!

How can things become someone's property?

Well, now-a-days, everything that is inside the boundaries of a country belongs to the country (except people, duh!). Even animals. But my question is, why? In the beggining of times you found something and it was yours, but when did it happen that something that doesn't have an owner or a explicit and verifiable thing that says that that something belongs to someone, belongs to the government? To rephrase that, when and who said that? Is it on the constitution? (I could answer that question, but it would take me a bit of time and my will is not in a good mood today), if so, then who owns the piece of paper that says that I own something?
today, if you want to own something, you have to meet the conditions the previous owner says (ussualy to pay money), but, who is the very first owner of that thing? in fact, who is the very first owner of everything? God? (oh dear lord in the otherworld illuminate us with your wisdom and help your children in Earth to understand your will, OH LOORD!)
no, seriously, who was the first owner of anything?
I hope I can go on with this post, but I missed the class our teacher sent us this homework, so all I said started from scratch, not like my other posts where I actually did think a lot to say what its there. Well, this is the E.N.D. (the extreme point of something, or Energy Never Dies? did Black Eyed Peas answer what they meant with the name of their last album?)